<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://schecterlaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schecterlaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:47:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Importance of Pleading Alternative Theories in a Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/16/the-importance-of-pleading-alternative-theories-in-a-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/16/the-importance-of-pleading-alternative-theories-in-a-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charter air ctr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feldman v villa regina association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleading alternative theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restorts int'l]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schecterlaw.com/?p=1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feldman v. Villa Regina Association, Inc., No. 3D10-1328 (Fla. 3d DCA May 2, 2012) This case involved a number of claims arising from alleged water intrusion, and damage to a condominium unit therefrom. At the inception of the case and throughout, the plaintiff proceeded solely on the theory that the injury to his unit was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/16/the-importance-of-pleading-alternative-theories-in-a-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Wins Review of Alleged Patent Violation by Samsung</title>
		<link>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/14/apple-wins-review-of-alleged-patent-violation-by-samsung/</link>
		<comments>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/14/apple-wins-review-of-alleged-patent-violation-by-samsung/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Schecter Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple wins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schecterlaw.com/?p=1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple Wins Bid to Pursue Samsung Tablet Ban A Federal Appeals Court ruled today that Apple could proceed with a legal claim that Samsung&#8217;s tablets violate patents held by Apple.&#160; Apple had initially filed suit in in April of 2011 alleging that Samsung was infringing on 4 patents that Apple holds that relate to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/14/apple-wins-review-of-alleged-patent-violation-by-samsung/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft accuses Motorola Mobility of unfair licensing on Patents</title>
		<link>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-accuses-motorola-mobility-of-unfair-licensing-on-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-accuses-motorola-mobility-of-unfair-licensing-on-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Schecter Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing on patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent royalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schecterlaw.com/?p=1004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft argued to today in federal court that Motorola Mobility is unfairly demanding $4 Billion in annual patent royalties. At the heart of the dispute is a claim by Microsoft that Motorola Mobility failed an obligation to offer fair licensing on patents it holds on technology essential to industry standards on Wi-Fi and video technology. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/08/microsoft-accuses-motorola-mobility-of-unfair-licensing-on-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle Gets Partial Win in Suit Against Google</title>
		<link>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/07/oracle-get-partial-win-in-suit-against-google/</link>
		<comments>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/07/oracle-get-partial-win-in-suit-against-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Schecter Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle get partial win]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suit against google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schecterlaw.com/?p=997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a partial win for Oracle, a jury decided unanimously today that Google did infringe on the overall structure, sequence and organization of Oracle&#8217;s Java programming language. Without getting into the technical details, Google violated Oracle&#8217;s copyright by&#8221;. . . liberally borrowing technology from Sun&#39;s Java &#8212; including the programming language itself, the syntax of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/07/oracle-get-partial-win-in-suit-against-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gov. Scott Signs Bill Targeting Companies That Do Business With Cuba, Syria</title>
		<link>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/04/gov-scott-signs-bill-targeting-companies-that-do-business-with-cuba-syria-3/</link>
		<comments>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/04/gov-scott-signs-bill-targeting-companies-that-do-business-with-cuba-syria-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 19:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Schecter Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida chamber of commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom tower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governor rick scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house bill 959]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schecterlaw.com/?p=982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Florida Governor Rick Scott is in the hot seat after he signed a bill this week making it illegal for state and local Florida governments to use public funds to hire companies conducting business with Cuba and Syria. The hotly debated bill, which was filed in December 2011, was publicly opposed by the Florida Chamber [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/05/04/gov-scott-signs-bill-targeting-companies-that-do-business-with-cuba-syria-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Personal Jurisdiction &#8211; Case Law Update</title>
		<link>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/23/florida-personal-jurisdiction-case-law-update-kitroser-v-hurt-no-sc-11-25-fla-march-22-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/23/florida-personal-jurisdiction-case-law-update-kitroser-v-hurt-no-sc-11-25-fla-march-22-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Schecter Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dale dickey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doe v thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida personal jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kitroser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kitroser v. hurt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schecterlaw.com/?p=948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KITROSER v. HURT, No. SC 11-25 (Fla. March 22, 2012) The corporate shield doctrine is set out clearly under Florida law as essentially the distinction between a corporate officer acting on one&#8217;s own and a corporate officer acting on behalf of one&#8217;s corporation.&#160; Doe v. Thompson, 620 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 1993). Generally, the acts [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/23/florida-personal-jurisdiction-case-law-update-kitroser-v-hurt-no-sc-11-25-fla-march-22-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Business Corporation Act and Director Liability</title>
		<link>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/03/florida-business-corporation-act-and-director-liability/</link>
		<comments>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/03/florida-business-corporation-act-and-director-liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Schecter Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director derived]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[director liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida business corporation act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right of the corporation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sldev.poweradvocates.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Florida Business Corporation Act, codified at Florida Statute section 607.0101, et seq., provides in pertinent part, as follows, with regard to director liability:&#160; A director is not personally liable for monetary damages to the corporation or any other person for any statement, vote, decision, or failure to act, regarding corporate management or policy, by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/03/florida-business-corporation-act-and-director-liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Arbitration Code and the Finality of Arbitration</title>
		<link>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/03/florida-arbitration-code-and-the-finality-of-arbitration/</link>
		<comments>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/03/florida-arbitration-code-and-the-finality-of-arbitration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Schecter Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finality of arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida arbitration code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sldev.poweradvocates.com/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although an arbitration award is final and binding in nature, the Florida Arbitration Code sets forth several provisions, further discussed below, that give new meaning to the words &#8220;final and binding&#8221;. &#160; By way of example, certain requirements of the Florida Arbitration Code are summarized below. 1. Fla. Stat. &#167;682.10: Provides that an application for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/03/florida-arbitration-code-and-the-finality-of-arbitration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defamation &#8211; Slander Per Se under Florida Law and Punitive Damages</title>
		<link>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/03/defamation-slander-per-se-under-florida-law-and-punitive-damages-2/</link>
		<comments>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/03/defamation-slander-per-se-under-florida-law-and-punitive-damages-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Schecter Law</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punitive damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sldev.poweradvocates.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defamation is generally defined as the unprivileged publication of false statements which naturally and proximately result in injury to another. &#160;Wolfson v. Kirk, 273 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). &#160;To establish a cause of action for defamation, a plaintiff must show: (1) That the defendant published a false statement about the plaintiff; (2) [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://schecterlaw.com/2012/04/03/defamation-slander-per-se-under-florida-law-and-punitive-damages-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

