100 North East 3rd Ave, Suite 620
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Phone: (954) 779-7009
Schecter Law

Posts Tagged ‘condo association’

Can Director of Condo Association be Held Personally Liable?

September 1st, 2010

By Mark Schecter | No Comments »

condo director

Florida courts have allowed personal liability in only a few instances – usually in cases where a director has gained monetary or other benefits at the expense of a condo association.

The law that sets the standard for how directors must perform is Florida Statute §617.0834.

According to this law, a director cannot be held personally liable for his actions unless one of three things happen:

1. He commits an act that violates a criminal law statute with reasonable knowledge that his actions are unlawful;

2. He acts in a way that is considered reckless, in bad faith or with malicious intent and disregard for safety, property and rights; and/or

3. The director engages in a transaction that is self-beneficial.

For the most part, the courts have made it clear that absent one of the elements mentioned above, condo directors are immune from personal liability.

One example of how the courts are applying the law can be seen in Munder v. Circle One Condominium, Inc. 596 So.2d 144 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The Munder case stems from a condo director’s failure to renew a fire insurance policy for the association’s clubhouse. He was sued for breach of fiduciary duty for this failure to act. The court decided that while the director may have been negligent, he cannot be held personally liable for damages caused by his errors.

Another example is Taylor v. Wellington Station Condominium Association, Inc., 633 So.2d 43 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). In this case, the court stated that personal liability cannot be triggered unless fraud, self-dealing or unjust enrichment is involved.

In a nutshell, it is difficult to hold an association director liable for his actions absent bad faith or malicious intent.

If you are involved in a dispute with your condo association due to acts of bad faith, we want to hear from you. You can use this form to contact us or call (954) 779-7009.

d49UKiAj0j0P

Boca Raton Condo Association is Being Sued

August 13th, 2010

By Mark Schecter | No Comments »

The Sun Sentinel is reporting that Boca Teeca Condominium Association located in Boca Raton, Florida is being sued by the Fair Housing Center of Greater Palm Beach.

The federal lawsuit alleges that Boca Teeca refuses to allow parents with children under the age of 15 to live within their community.

The lawsuit stems from an incident in which a single father with three young children was turned away in December 2008 despite having financing in line to buy a $120,000 condo unit.

The father of three and his real estate agent reported the incident to the Palm Beach County Office of Equal Opportunity who later launched its own investigation.A female employee was later sent to Boca Teeca to inquire about renting a condo unit with two young children. She was also turned away by the association as her kids were under the age of 15.

“In the previous two years, discrimination cases against families ranked third, behind disability and race cases. Of the 96 cases investigated in 2008-09, 45 percent were for people with disabilities, 25 percent were for families with children, and 14 percent were for race and color,” according to Pamela Guerrier, manager of the Office of Equal Opportunity.

Randall Berg, attorney for the Fair Housing Center, says a condo association can legally stop families with young children from moving into its community when (and only when) they are considered “housing for older persons” as set forth under federal and state housing laws.

To qualify as “housing for older persons,” the community must show that at least 80 percent of their residents are 55 or older.

Boca Teeca was advised it is breaking the law by denying young children, and asked to reverse its decision. The association ignored the request and earlier this week, a federal lawsuit was filed against Boca Teeca and its President Ronald Erhardt detailing the Office of Equal Opportunity’s investigation and email negotiations.

Source: Sun Sentinel

Have you encountered this problem? Contact our real estate lawyers today. You can email our firm or give us a call at (954) 779-7009.

Florida Condo Association Sues for Breach of Contract

June 19th, 2010

By Mark Schecter | No Comments »

Tiara Condominium Association is involved in a lawsuit filed against its insurance broker, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

The association which manages the Tiara condominium tower in Palm Beach County is suing Marsh alleging that the broker failed to secure an adequate insurance policy to cover damages to the condo tower.

Case Background

Tiara hired Marsh to obtain an insurance policy to cover its entire building. In 2004, a policy was purchased from Citizens Insurance Company that offered a coverage limit of $50 million.

In September 2004, the condo tower sustained substantial damage as a result of two hurricanes – Frances and Jeanne. The damage from both hurricanes exceeded the $50 million limits but the association claims it was verbally assured by Marsh that its insurance policy would cover $50 million for each hurricane disaster – a total of $100 million.

Tiara moved forward with repairs. It decided not to merely dry the tower out but eventually renovated the damaged areas. When done, the repair work exceeded $100 million.

Once the renovations were completed, Tiara sought reimbursement of $100 million from the insurance company – $50 million per hurricane occurrence – to cover the repairs. Citizens denied Tiara’s request stating that the policy purchased in 2004 provided a $50 million limit and nothing more.

Tiara filed a lawsuit against Citizens for its damages and eventually reached a settlement with the insurer of $89 million, a portion of the renovations costs.

The association, under the contention that Marsh’s negligence caused the insufficient recovery from Citizens, next filed a lawsuit against Marsh for:

  • breach of contract;
  • negligent misrepresentation;
  • breach of the implied convenient of good faith and fair dealing;
  • negligence; and
  • breach of fiduciary duty

The condo association contends the insurance broker breached the contract with the association in two ways.

  1. He failed to procure a policy with adequate insurance coverage; and
  2. He breached an oral agreement to take responsibility for any damages incurred as a result of insufficient coverage

Upon review of the insurance policy (contract), the District Court found the language unclear as to “aggregate limits” versus per-occurrence limits. Thus, the terms of the contract was construed in favor of the insured (or broker) and against the insurer (Citizens) that prepared the contract. First Specialty Ins. Co. vs. Caliber One Indem. Co., 988 So. 2d. 708, 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008).

As for the second breach of contract claim, the court has previously established that a breach of oral contract arises when the parties mutually assented to a definite proposition and left no essential terms open. Rubenstein vs. Primedica Healthcare, Inc., 755 So. 2d. 746, 748 (Fla. Dist. Crt. App. 2000).

In this case, the court did not find any evidence that the oral agreement between the parties extended beyond the written policy agreement.

In fact, the parties could not agree on the nature of the oral agreement.

Are you dealing with a similar contract law issue? Contact us! Our attorneys are highly skilled in handling breach of contract cases for businesses and corporations of all sizes.

You can use this form to email us or give us a call at (954) 779-7009.